In rectangle , and . Points and lie on , points and lie on , points and lie on , and points and lie on so that and the convex octagon is equilateral. The length of a side of this octagon can be expressed in the form , where , , and are integers and is not divisible by the square of any prime. What is ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
B
Key insight
With side s, the corner legs are (8-s)/2 and (6-s)/2, and the Pythagorean theorem gives s^2 + 14s - 50 = 0, so s = -7 + 3 sqrt(11).
Solution
Let the octagon's side be . Cutting the four corners of the rectangle leaves four right triangles, each with hypotenuse . Let and let be the other leg of the corner triangle at .
Side lies on : , so .
The corner triangles at and both have a leg and hypotenuse , so their other legs are equal: . The same reasoning at the other corners shows all four corner triangles are congruent, so and .
Pythagoras in a corner triangle:
Multiply by : , i.e. , so
(Check: , so as required.)
Thus . The answer is .
Why this works
An equilateral octagon inscribed in a rectangle is a rectangle with four congruent right-triangle corners removed. Two linear relations (along the length and the width) express both legs in terms of , and the Pythagorean theorem supplies the one quadratic needed. The word "equilateral," not "regular," is the warning that the angles are not all equal.
Alternative approach
Complete the square instead of using the quadratic formula: becomes , so . Numerically ; then , and , and , a quick check of the setup.
The trap
Assuming the octagon is regular (all angles 135 degrees) and using 45-45-90 corner triangles, which contradicts the 8-by-6 rectangle.
Common mistakes
- Assuming the octagon is regular (all angles 135 degrees) and using 45-45-90 corner triangles, which contradicts the 8-by-6 rectangle.
- Leaving the answer as and computing , forgetting that must be squarefree.
Techniques
Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed · Exploit symmetry to reduce work or pair up objects