In rectangle and . Point between and , and point between and are such that . Segments and intersect at and , respectively. The ratio can be written as where the greatest common factor of and is 1. What is ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
E
Key insight
Similar triangles cut BD in ratios BE : AD = 1 : 3 and BF : AD = 2 : 3, so BP = BD/4 and BQ = 2BD/5.
Solution
Since is split into three equal parts, and , while .
Because , triangles and are similar (vertical angles at , alternate interior angles at and ). Hence
Likewise triangles and are similar, giving
Measure everything in twentieths of : , , so and . Thus
already in lowest terms, and .
The answer is .
Why this works
A line from a vertex of a rectangle to a point on the opposite side crosses the diagonal in a ratio equal to the ratio of the two parallel segments it connects. The two cevians from give two such ratios on the same diagonal; converting both to a common denominator () lets you read off the three pieces. The actual length never matters, a sign that the problem is about ratios, not lengths.
Alternative approach
Coordinates: , , , , , . Parametrize as . Meeting () gives ; meeting () gives . The pieces are of , i.e. .
The trap
Dividing BD into the ratios 1 : 3 and 2 : 3 and then combining them without a common denominator, or reporting BP : BQ : BD instead of BP : PQ : QD.
Common mistakes
- Dividing BD into the ratios 1 : 3 and 2 : 3 and then combining them without a common denominator, or reporting BP : BQ : BD instead of BP : PQ : QD.
- Using or instead of as the similarity ratio.
Techniques
Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed