How many isosceles triangles are there with positive area whose side lengths are all positive integers and whose longest side has length ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
D
Key insight
Split on where the equal pair sits: (2025, 2025, b) needs only 1 <= b <= 2025, while (a, a, 2025) needs 2a > 2025, so a >= 1013.
Solution
Positive area means the triangle inequality must be strict. The longest side is , so every side is at most and at least one side equals . An isosceles triangle has a pair of equal sides, and the two cases are decided by whether that pair is the longest side or not.
The equal pair is the longest side. The triangle is with . The inequality is automatic and holds for every such , so all values work. This case includes the equilateral triangle .
The equal pair is shorter. The triangle is with , and now the inequality bites: the two short sides must beat the long one, so
Hence runs from to , giving triangles.
The cases are disjoint, since the repeated side equals in the first and is smaller in the second, so the total is
The answer is .
Why this works
Fixing the longest side first is what makes the count finite and the casework short: once is pinned down, an isosceles triangle is determined by a single other integer, and the only question is which values of it are legal. The triangle inequality is slack in one case and tight in the other, which is exactly why the two families have different sizes. The same argument with an odd longest side gives triangles in all.
The trap
Counting only the triangles whose two equal sides are the longest, giving 2025, choice (A).
Common mistakes
- Counting only the triangles whose two equal sides are the longest, giving 2025, choice (A).
- Ignoring the triangle inequality in the second family and allowing every from to , which inflates the count towards , choice (E).
- Counting the equilateral triangle in both families and answering .
Techniques
Split into exhaustive cases and handle each · Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed