The sequence is arithmetic. The sequence is geometric. Both sequences are strictly increasing and contain only integers, and is as small as possible. What is the value of ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
E
Key insight
The geometric sequence starts at 1, so z = p^3; the arithmetic one forces 3 | z - 1, and p^3 = p mod 3 makes p = 4 smallest.
Solution
The geometric sequence. Its first term is , so its ratio is , an integer, and the sequence is with . Strictly increasing forces .
The arithmetic sequence. With common difference the terms are , so
and .
So must be a cube with and . Since (check in turn), this says simply . Test in order:
- : , and is not a multiple of . Fails.
- : , and is not a multiple of . Fails.
- : , and . Works, with .
The smallest possible is therefore , giving and . Both are strictly increasing sequences of integers, so
The answer is .
Why this works
A geometric sequence whose first term is has its ratio sitting right there as the second term, so "integer terms" immediately means "integer ratio" and kills all fractional ratios at once. The two sequences meet only at , so the whole problem is the intersection of two descriptions of : a cube, and one more than a multiple of . Turning each condition into a statement about alone, then searching upward, is the standard way to handle "as small as possible" problems.
Alternative approach
Work from the answers. Each choice is , and for the arithmetic part , while for the geometric part with . So the total is . Trying , gives ; trying or gives or , neither of which is offered, confirming that those values of are excluded.
The trap
Taking the smallest cube z = 8 because 1, 2, 4, 8 is the smallest increasing integer geometric sequence, without checking that 1, x, y, z arithmetic needs z - 1 divisible by 3.
Common mistakes
- Taking the smallest cube z = 8 because 1, 2, 4, 8 is the smallest increasing integer geometric sequence, without checking that 1, x, y, z arithmetic needs z - 1 divisible by 3.
- Allowing a non-integer ratio such as ; then is not an integer, so the sequence fails the "only integers" condition even though might be an integer.
- Summing only or forgetting that itself appears once in the requested total.
Techniques
Organized listing / direct enumeration · Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed