A list of real numbers consists of , , , , , and , as well as , , and with . The range of the list is , and the mean and the median are both positive integers. How many ordered triples ( , , ) are possible?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
C
Key insight
The median must be one of x, y, z; the mean forces x+y+z = 11.2 or 20.2; the range forces x = 0, z = 8, or z = x+7.
Solution
The six given numbers sum to , so an integer mean needs . Range puts every value in , so only , , are possible.
Median: the fifth smallest of nine values must be an integer. Neither nor can be fifth, and the other given numbers are not integers, so the median is one of .
Split by which values are extreme.
Min , max . Then , . The four smallest are , so is the median with , and . gives ; gives . Triple .
Min , max . Then , , and again . From : gives (or , too big); gives nothing valid. Triple .
Min , max . Then , , and . Sum leaves as median, rejected. For , ; the fifth value is if and if , so is the median with , . Triple .
Min , max has range , impossible.
Three triples. The answer is .
Why this works
Each statistic translates into a concrete constraint: the mean into a divisibility condition on the sum, the range into "who is the extreme value," and the median into "which unknown is fifth and is an integer." Organizing by the range (four cases on the min and max) keeps the search finite and forces one unknown per case, after which the sum condition determines the rest.
The trap
Treating the median as 5.2 or one of the given numbers; with nine values the fifth must be an integer, so one of x, y, z has to sit in the middle.
Common mistakes
- Treating the median as 5.2 or one of the given numbers; with nine values the fifth must be an integer, so one of x, y, z has to sit in the middle.
- Accepting without checking the range; so it fails.
Techniques
Bound the quantity above/below or estimate to pin it down · Split into exhaustive cases and handle each