Maureen is keeping track of the mean of her quiz scores this semester. If Maureen scores an on the next quiz, her mean will increase by . If she scores an on each of the next three quizzes, her mean will increase by . What is the mean of her quiz scores currently?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
D
Key insight
Write total = n times mean; both scenarios give linear equations in n and the mean, which reduce to m + n = 10 and 3m + 2n = 27.
Solution
Let Maureen have taken quizzes with mean , so her scores total .
One more quiz scoring gives quizzes with mean :
Three more quizzes scoring each give quizzes with mean :
Substituting into the second equation: , so (and ).
Check: scores total ; one gives ; three s give .
The answer is .
Why this works
Averages become tractable the moment you convert them to totals: "mean over items" is a total of . Each scenario is then one linear equation, and the terms cancel, leaving an ordinary two-variable system. The check at the end is cheap and catches sign errors.
Alternative approach
Think of each new as spreading its excess over all quizzes. After one quiz the new mean is , so the exceeds it by , which must lift the other scores by each: . After three quizzes the new mean is ; each exceeds it by , and . Same system, no expansion needed.
The trap
Treating the mean increase as if the number of quizzes stays the same, or letting the two scenarios have different current means.
Common mistakes
- Treating the mean increase as if the number of quizzes stays the same, or letting the two scenarios have different current means.
- Expanding incorrectly, e.g. writing as .
Techniques
Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed