Each of the edges of a cube is labeled or . Two labelings are considered different even if one can be obtained from the other by a sequence of one or more rotations and/or reflections. For how many such labelings is the sum of the labels on the edges of each of the faces of the cube equal to ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
E
Key insight
Six edges are labeled 1 and the top and bottom faces take 4, so exactly 2 vertical edges are 1: diagonal pairs give 12 labelings, adjacent pairs give 8.
Solution
How many ones? Each edge lies on exactly two faces, so adding the six face totals counts every edge twice: , so exactly edges are labeled .
Pivot on the vertical edges. The top and bottom faces each contain ones among their horizontal edges, accounting for ones, so exactly of the vertical edges are . Number the top corners in order; vertical edge hangs from corner , and side face contains , , top edge and bottom edge .
Case A: diagonal pair (; such pairs). Each side face has one vertical and needs exactly one of its : on all four sides. The top face needs two of the four 's equal to : ways. The 's are then forced and the bottom face automatically totals . Total .
Case B: adjacent pair (; such pairs). Face is full, so ; face has no vertical ones, so . Faces and each need exactly one of , while the top face needs one more from and the bottom one more from . Choosing forces , , ; the mirror choice also works. So completions, total .
Altogether .
The answer is .
Why this works
A global count (six ones, via double counting) plus a well-chosen pivot (the four vertical edges) turns a twelve-variable problem into two small cases where every remaining edge is either forced or a free binary choice. Choosing the pivot set so that every face contains some of it is what makes the rest propagate. Note the wording: labelings related by symmetry are counted separately, so no division by or .
Alternative approach
Structural view of the labelings: are "two opposite corners with all three edges at each" (one per antipodal pair), are skew hexagons (Petrie polygons, one per antipodal pair of omitted vertices), and are pairs of disjoint three-edge paths. Recognizing these shapes is elegant but easy to get wrong under time pressure; the casework above is safer.
The trap
Dividing by symmetries because of the sentence about rotations and reflections, which actually says NOT to identify symmetric labelings.
Common mistakes
- Dividing by symmetries because of the sentence about rotations and reflections, which actually says NOT to identify symmetric labelings.
- Assuming the two ones on a face must be opposite edges (or must be adjacent); both configurations occur, and only careful casework catches all .
Techniques
Split into exhaustive cases and handle each · Use an invariant, parity, or coloring argument