When a student multiplied the number by the repeating decimal, where and are digits, he did not notice the notation and just multiplied times Later he found that his answer is less than the correct answer. What is the -digit number
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
E
Key insight
The student only lost the tail 0.00ababab... Multiplying that lost part by 66 must give exactly 0.5.
Solution
The student's answer came out too small because he used a smaller number. So look at exactly what he left out.
1. The correct number is and he used . The difference is the tail he dropped:
For example, if were :
2. Let be the two-digit number . A known fact about repeating decimals: . (For example, .)
3. The dropped tail is that same decimal moved two places to the right, which divides it by . So the tail is .
4. Multiplying by , his answer was short by
5. This shortfall is , so and .
6. Check: , while . The difference is .
The answer is .
Why this works
Subtracting the wrong product from the right one leaves only the piece of the number that was ignored, so you never need and separately. A two-digit repeating block is , and every place it is shifted to the right divides it by another .
Alternative approach
Test the choices using the shortfall from step 4: gives , gives , and gives . Only works.
The trap
Writing the lost part as ab/99 instead of ab/9900 (it starts two places further right), which gives no whole-number answer.
Concise solution
Let be the two-digit number. The correct factor is and the student used ; their difference is the part he dropped:
Multiplying by changes the product by , and this must equal :
The answer is .
Review in the AoPS books
- Introduction to Number Theory, Chapter 11: Decimals and Fractions
- Introduction to Algebra, Chapter 3: One-Variable Linear Equations (§3.3, §3.4)
- Prealgebra, Chapter 6: Decimals (§6.3, §6.4)
- Introduction to Algebra, Chapter 7: Proportion (§7.4)
Techniques
Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed