In a certain card game, a player is dealt a hand of cards from a deck of distinct cards. The number of distinct (unordered) hands that can be dealt to the player can be written as . What is the digit ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
A
Key insight
Legendre's formula shows C(52,10) is divisible by 4 but not 8 and not by 3; digit rules for 3, 4, 8 leave only A = 2.
Solution
The number is . Instead of computing it, test divisibility by small primes using the exponent of each prime in the factorials.
Prime 3. Exponent in : . In : . In : . Net: , so . The digit sum of is , which must not be a multiple of : this rules out and .
Prime 2. Exponent in : . In : . In : . Net: , so is divisible by but not by .
Divisible by : the last two digits must form a multiple of , so is even; this rules out . Not divisible by : the last three digits must not be a multiple of . For , fails; for , is fine.
Only survives (indeed ).
The answer is .
Why this works
A number given with unknown digits is a divisibility puzzle: you cannot compute it, but you can know exactly which small primes divide it via Legendre's formula applied to the factorials, and the digit rules for , and translate that into constraints on . The "not divisible" facts are as useful as the "divisible" ones.
The trap
Trying to compute C(52,10) exactly, or using divisibility by 11 (which every choice satisfies) and getting nowhere.
Common mistakes
- Trying to compute C(52,10) exactly, or using divisibility by 11 (which every choice satisfies) and getting nowhere.
- Assuming is divisible by or by because the factorials contain many threes, without subtracting the exponents in the denominator.
Techniques
Use the answer choices (mod checks, size, form) to eliminate or select · Use an invariant, parity, or coloring argument