Right triangles and have areas 1 and 2, respectively. A side of is congruent to a side of , and a different side of is congruent to a different side of . What is the square of the product of the other (third) sides of and ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
A
Key insight
Two shared legs would force equal areas, so the hypotenuse of the small triangle must be a leg of the big one, doubling one leg and forcing a 30-60-90 shape.
Solution
Let have legs and hypotenuse , with .
If the two shared sides were both legs of both triangles, the areas would match, contradiction. If were the hypotenuse of as well and one leg were shared, the other legs would be equal too, so the triangles would be congruent, again contradicting the areas. Hence the hypotenuse of is a leg of . The second shared side is a leg of , say ; it is shorter than , so it cannot be the hypotenuse of and must be the other leg.
So has legs and with . Dividing by gives . Then becomes , so and . From : , so .
The third sides are (for ) and the hypotenuse of , . Their product is , and its square is
The answer is .
Why this works
Area and side-sharing constraints interact through which roles the shared sides play. Eliminating the impossible pairings leaves one configuration, and the area ratio then translates into a length ratio , which forces to be --. Asking for the square of the product is a hint that the lengths themselves involve nested radicals; work with throughout.
The trap
Assuming the two triangles share both legs (impossible with different areas) or that the shared sides are both hypotenuses.
Common mistakes
- Assuming the two triangles share both legs (impossible with different areas) or that the shared sides are both hypotenuses.
- Reporting or the unsquared product, instead of its square .
Techniques
Apply an identity: SFFT, sum of squares, difference of cubes, Vieta · Split into exhaustive cases and handle each