Jerry and Silvia wanted to go from the southwest corner of a square field to the northeast corner. Jerry walked due east and then due north to reach the goal, but Silvia headed northeast and reached the goal walking in a straight line. Which of the following is closest to how much shorter Silvia's trip was, compared to Jerry's trip?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
A
Key insight
With side 1, Jerry walks 2 and Silvia walks the diagonal sqrt(2) of about 1.41, so she saves about 0.59 out of 2, roughly 30%.
Solution
The size of the field does not matter, so let each side be .
Jerry walks two full sides: .
Silvia walks the diagonal, the hypotenuse of a right isosceles triangle with legs , so her distance is .
She saves , which as a fraction of Jerry's trip is
The closest choice is .
Why this works
"How much shorter" is a percent decrease, so the base is the longer (original) trip. The diagonal of a square is times its side, so the ratio diagonal-to-two-sides is , and the saving is regardless of the field's size.
The trap
Computing the saving as a fraction of Silvia's distance (about 41%) instead of Jerry's, or forgetting the diagonal is sqrt(2), not 1.5.
Common mistakes
- Computing the saving as a fraction of Silvia's distance (about 41%) instead of Jerry's, or forgetting the diagonal is sqrt(2), not 1.5.
- Reporting the ratio (choice E), which is how long her trip is, not how much shorter.
Techniques
Bound the quantity above/below or estimate to pin it down · Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed