Ms. Carroll promised that anyone who got all the multiple choice questions right on the upcoming exam would receive an A on the exam. Which of these statements necessarily follows logically?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
B
Key insight
The promise is 'all right implies an A'; the only statement forced by it is the contrapositive: no A implies at least one question wrong.
Solution
Write for "Lewis got every multiple choice question right" and for "Lewis received an A." The promise is exactly .
An implication is logically equivalent to its contrapositive, . Here "not " means "at least one multiple choice question was wrong," so the contrapositive reads: if Lewis did not receive an A, then he missed at least one question. That is statement (B).
Check the others. (A) strengthens "not all right" to "all wrong," which is not justified. (C) is the inverse () and (D) is the converse (); neither follows, since the promise says nothing about how else an A might be earned. (E) is also a claim about what happens given an A, which the promise does not address.
The answer is
Why this works
From you may conclude only itself and its contrapositive. Translating the negation correctly matters: the opposite of "all right" is "at least one wrong," never "all wrong." When a logic problem offers converse, inverse and contrapositive as choices, the contrapositive is the one that must be true.
The trap
Choosing the converse (D): receiving an A does not force all answers right, because the teacher never said an A can be earned only that way.
Common mistakes
- Choosing the converse (D): receiving an A does not force all answers right, because the teacher never said an A can be earned only that way.
- Negating "all right" as "all wrong" and picking (A).
Techniques
Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed