Mia is “helping” her mom pick up toys that are strewn on the floor. Mia’s mom manages to put toys into the toy box every seconds, but each time immediately after those seconds have elapsed, Mia takes toys out of the box. How much time, in minutes, will it take Mia and her mom to put all toys into the box for the first time?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
B
Key insight
Each 30-second cycle nets one toy, but the box reaches 30 the instant Mom drops in her third batch, before Mia can react, so 27 cycles plus one more deposit.
Solution
Think of each -second period as a cycle: Mom adds toys at the end of the period, and Mia immediately removes . The net gain per cycle is toy, so after complete cycles (Mom's deposit followed by Mia's removal) there are toys in the box.
The count reaches at the moment Mom deposits, not after Mia removes. After complete cycles there are toys. During the th period Mom adds more, and at that instant the box holds toys for the first time. Mia's removal afterward is irrelevant.
That moment is periods of seconds: seconds minutes.
The answer is .
Why this works
"Net rate" reasoning gives the right long-run picture but can miss the finish line, because the target is hit in the middle of a cycle. In any back-and-forth process, always ask what the count looks like at the peak of a cycle, not just at the end of one. Here the peak after deposits is , and at .
Alternative approach
Track peaks: after Mom's first deposit there are , then after the second, then , and so on: the th deposit brings the box to toys. Setting gives deposits, i.e. half-minutes, which is minutes.
The trap
Dividing 30 toys by the net rate of 1 toy per half-minute and answering 15 minutes.
Common mistakes
- Dividing 30 toys by the net rate of 1 toy per half-minute and answering 15 minutes.
- Using or cycles from an off-by-one error and choosing or .
Techniques
Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed · Compute small cases, spot the pattern, generalize