There are 10 horses, named Horse 1, Horse 2, , Horse 10. They get their names from how many minutes it takes them to run one lap around a circular race track: Horse runs one lap in exactly minutes. At time 0 all the horses are together at the starting point on the track. The horses start running in the same direction, and they keep running around the circular track at their constant speeds. The least time , in minutes, at which all 10 horses will again simultaneously be at the starting point is . Let be the least time, in minutes, such that at least 5 of the horses are again at the starting point. What is the sum of the digits of ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
B
Key insight
Horse k is at the start at time T exactly when k divides T, so T is the least number with five divisors among 1 to 10: T = 12.
Solution
Horse is back at the starting point at time exactly when is a multiple of . So at time the horses at the start are the horses whose numbers divide , and we want the smallest with at least five divisors in .
Any has at most four divisors in total (, and each have exactly four; the primes have two), so none works.
has divisors , and five of them are at most : Horses are all at the start after minutes.
So and the sum of its digits is .
The answer is .
Why this works
The story about laps is a disguise for divisibility: "Horse is at the start" means "." The given value is the "all horses" version; the "at least five" version asks for the smallest highly divisible number instead, and is the smallest positive integer with more than four divisors.
The trap
Reading 'at least 5 horses' as 'Horses 1 through 5' and computing lcm(1,...,5) = 60, whose digit sum 6 is choice (E).
Common mistakes
- Reading 'at least 5 horses' as 'Horses 1 through 5' and computing lcm(1,...,5) = 60, whose digit sum 6 is choice (E).
- Answering itself or forgetting the final step of summing the digits.
Techniques
Bound the quantity above/below or estimate to pin it down · Organized listing / direct enumeration