At Megapolis Hospital one year, multiple-birth statistics were as follows: Sets of twins, triplets, and quadruplets accounted for of the babies born. There were four times as many sets of triplets as sets of quadruplets, and there was three times as many sets of twins as sets of triplets. How many of these babies were in sets of quadruplets?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
D
Key insight
With q sets of quadruplets there are 4q sets of triplets and 12q sets of twins, so the babies number 4q + 12q + 24q = 40q = 1000.
Solution
Everything is compared to the quadruplets, so start with them.
1. Let be the number of sets of quadruplets.
2. There are times as many sets of triplets: sets.
3. There are times as many sets of twins as sets of triplets: sets.
4. The counts babies, not sets. A set of quadruplets is babies, triplets , and twins . So
5. So sets of quadruplets.
6. The question asks for babies in those sets: .
The answer is .
Why this works
A chain of "times as many" facts becomes one equation if you name the thing everything else is compared to. The only catch is units: the ratios are about sets, but the total is about babies. Multiply each number of sets by the size of the set before adding.
The trap
Answering 25, the number of sets of quadruplets. The question asks for babies, which is 4 times as many.
Concise solution
Everything is described relative to the quadruplets, so let there be sets of quadruplets. Then there are sets of triplets and sets of twins.
Count babies, not sets: each set of quadruplets holds babies, each set of triplets , each set of twins . So
which gives sets of quadruplets.
The question asks for babies in sets of quadruplets: .
The answer is .
Review in the AoPS books
- Introduction to Algebra, Chapter 3: One-Variable Linear Equations (§3.3, §3.4)
- Introduction to Algebra, Chapter 6: Ratios and Percents
- Introduction to Algebra, Chapter 7: Proportion (§7.4)
- Prealgebra, Chapter 13: Data and Statistics (§13.1)
Techniques
Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed