For some positive integer , the number has positive integer divisors, including and the number . How many positive integer divisors does the number have?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
D
Key insight
In 110n^3 the primes 2, 5, 11 give divisor-count factors 3e+2 and other primes give 3e+1, so 110 = 2*5*11 forces exponents {0, 1, 3}.
Solution
Write where has no factor of , or , and let the primes of have exponents in . Then
so its divisor count is
Each of the three factors , , is at least , so their product is at least ; the leftover must then be a divisor of that is at most and is more than a multiple of . The candidates fail unless the product is (with the remaining product would be , too small to be a product of three numbers each at least ). So and , i.e. in some order.
Thus for two distinct primes , and neither is . Then
which has divisors, regardless of which primes play the roles of and .
The answer is .
Why this works
The divisor-count function depends only on exponents, and multiplying by shifts three exponents by . Cubing makes every exponent a multiple of , so the factors of the divisor count fall into residue classes mod that distinguish "primes in " from "other primes." Matching those classes against the factorization of pins down 's exponent multiset without determining itself, and the final answer is symmetric in the choice, exactly what a well-posed problem needs.
The trap
Assuming n must be a specific number (like n = 1 or n = 2 * 5^3) and not realizing the exponents can be permuted, or forgetting to include the 3^4 factor of 81 in the final count.
Common mistakes
- Assuming n must be a specific number (like n = 1 or n = 2 * 5^3) and not realizing the exponents can be permuted, or forgetting to include the 3^4 factor of 81 in the final count.
- Setting the divisor count of equal to by using exponents directly rather than , , .
Techniques
Bound the quantity above/below or estimate to pin it down · Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed