A rectangular box measures , where and are integers and . The volume and surface area of the box are numerically equal. How many ordered triples are possible?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
B
Key insight
Divide by abc to get 1/a + 1/b + 1/c = 1/2; ordering forces 3 <= a <= 6, then bound b likewise and solve for c.
Solution
The condition is . Dividing by :
Since , is the largest term, so gives ; and gives . Now for each , let . Then with forces , so , and must be an integer at least .
- , , , : give ; gives . 5 triples.
- , , , : give ; gives . 3 triples.
- , , and , : gives ; gives . 1 triple.
- , , and : , . 1 triple.
Total: .
The answer is .
Why this works
Dividing by the product converts a symmetric three-variable equation into a sum of unit fractions, and the ordering then gives two-sided bounds on the smallest variable at every stage ( target ). This "bound the smallest, recurse" pattern solves nearly every Egyptian-fraction problem. Each case leaves a single unknown, whose integrality is a quick check.
Alternative approach
Simon's Favorite Factoring Trick per case: for , becomes , and factor pairs of with give triples; for , gives ; for , with gives ; for , with gives only .
The trap
Losing solutions by bounding b too tightly, or counting unordered triples with permutations (the condition a <= b <= c means each solution set counts once).
Common mistakes
- Losing solutions by bounding b too tightly, or counting unordered triples with permutations (the condition a <= b <= c means each solution set counts once).
- Forgetting the case (its factoring is ugly) or the boundary case such as , , , each of which is valid.
Techniques
Bound the quantity above/below or estimate to pin it down · Split into exhaustive cases and handle each