Al, Bill, and Cal will each randomly be assigned a whole number from to , inclusive, with no two of them getting the same number. What is the probability that Al's number will be a whole number multiple of Bill's and Bill's number will be a whole number multiple of Cal's?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
C
Key insight
Distinct numbers in a divisor chain strictly increase, so Cal's number is at most 2; listing the chains c | b | a gives 9 of 720 outcomes.
Solution
The assignment is an ordered triple of distinct numbers, so there are equally likely outcomes.
Let the numbers be (Al), (Bill), (Cal) with and . Since the numbers are distinct, each multiple is a proper multiple, so . In particular (if then and ).
Case : choose , then a larger multiple of up to .
- : , ways.
- : , ways.
- : , way.
- : , way.
- : no .
That is triples.
Case : , and must be a larger multiple of at most ; only , works. That is triple.
Total favorable: . The probability is .
The answer is .
Why this works
A divisibility chain among distinct positive integers is strictly increasing and at least doubles at each step, which caps the smallest element immediately and keeps the enumeration to a handful of lines. Fix the most constrained variable (Cal's, the smallest) and list outward. Keep numerator and denominator in the same model: both count ordered assignments.
The trap
Using 1000 or C(10,3) = 120 as the denominator instead of the 10 * 9 * 8 = 720 ordered assignments of distinct numbers.
Common mistakes
- Using 1000 or C(10,3) = 120 as the denominator instead of the 10 9 8 = 720 ordered assignments of distinct numbers.
- Allowing or (every number is a multiple of itself), which inflates the count because the problem requires distinct numbers.
Techniques
Organized listing / direct enumeration · Split into exhaustive cases and handle each