Two years ago Pete was three times as old as his cousin Claire. 2 years before that, Pete was four times as old as Claire. In how many years will the ratio of their ages be : ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
B
Key insight
Set up both past conditions in terms of current ages, solve to get Pete 20 and Claire 8, then find x with 20 + x = 2(8 + x).
Solution
Let Pete's and Claire's ages two years ago be and , so . Two years before that their ages were and , with
Substituting : , so and . Today Claire is and Pete is .
In years the ratio is when
Check: in years Pete is and Claire is .
The answer is .
Why this works
In age problems the difference of two ages never changes, only the ratio does. Two snapshots of the ratio pin down the ages at those times; then the future condition is one more linear equation. Anchoring the variables at "two years ago" keeps the arithmetic smallest.
Alternative approach
Use the constant age gap. From "three times" two years ago, the gap is ; from "four times" four years ago, the gap is . Equal gaps give , so and the gap is . The ratio is exactly when Claire's age equals the gap, , which is years from now (she is today).
The trap
Using 'two years ago' for both conditions instead of shifting the second condition four years back, or stopping after finding the current ages.
Common mistakes
- Using "two years ago" for both conditions instead of shifting the second condition four years back, or stopping after finding the current ages.
- Answering , the number of years from the first snapshot (two years ago) until the ratio becomes , rather than from today.
Techniques
Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed