A rectangle with positive integer side lengths in has area and perimeter . Which of the following numbers cannot equal ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
B
Key insight
Since A + P + 4 = (x+2)(y+2), a value works exactly when adding 4 gives a product of two factors each at least 3; 106 = 2*53 fails.
Solution
Let the sides be positive integers and . Then
Adding completes a product:
Since , both factors are at least . So a number can equal exactly when splits as a product of two integers that are each at least .
Test the choices:
- , so , works.
- . Because is prime, the only factorizations are and , and each has a factor smaller than . No rectangle exists.
- , giving a rectangle.
- , giving .
- , giving .
Only is impossible. The answer is .
Why this works
An expression of the form becomes a product after adding the constant ; that is Simon's Favorite Factoring Trick. It converts "can this value be achieved?" into "does this shifted number have a factorization with the right constraints?", which is a quick divisibility check. Whenever a problem mixes a product of two unknowns with linear terms in the same unknowns, try completing the rectangle.
Alternative approach
Reason about the shifted numbers directly: must have a divisor with . Among , only is twice a prime, so it alone has no such divisor.
The trap
Hunting for a rectangle for each choice by trial and stopping when one is not found, with no factorization to prove 102 is impossible.
Common mistakes
- Hunting for a rectangle for each choice by trial and stopping when one is not found, with no factorization to prove is impossible.
- Allowing a factor of , i.e. a side of length , which would make appear to work.
- Factoring the choices themselves instead of the choices plus ; for example has nothing to do with the problem.
Techniques
Apply an identity: SFFT, sum of squares, difference of cubes, Vieta · Use the answer choices (mod checks, size, form) to eliminate or select