In a small pond there are eleven lily pads in a row labeled through . A frog is sitting on pad . When the frog is on pad , , it will jump to pad with probability and to pad with probability . Each jump is independent of the previous jumps. If the frog reaches pad it will be eaten by a patiently waiting snake. If the frog reaches pad it will exit the pond, never to return. What is the probability that the frog will escape without being eaten by the snake?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
C
Key insight
Consecutive differences of the escape probabilities satisfy d_N = N/(10-N) d_{N-1}, so d_N = d_0 / C(9,N), and the differences sum to 1.
Solution
Let be the probability of escaping from pad , so and . One jump from pad gives
Move across: . Writing , this is
So , , , ; in general , which is symmetric ().
The differences telescope: . Hence
So , and since , the frog escapes with probability .
The answer is .
Why this works
Absorbing random walks are solved by first-step equations, but ten coupled equations are painful. The trick that recurs in every such problem: rewrite the equation as a relation between consecutive differences, which makes the recurrence first-order and multiplicative, then use the known endpoints to normalize because the differences telescope to .
Alternative approach
By the symmetry (which swaps snake and exit), . Set and march forward: , , , . Then gives .
The trap
Solving the ten linear equations by brute substitution and making a fraction error; the difference recurrence turns it into one clean sum.
Common mistakes
- Solving the ten linear equations by brute substitution and making a fraction error; the difference recurrence turns it into one clean sum.
- Guessing from the symmetry of the jump rule; the symmetry gives , but the frog starts at pad , far from the middle.
Techniques
Define states/recurrence and iterate · Exploit symmetry to reduce work or pair up objects · Collapse a sum or product by cancellation