For the consumer, a single discount of is more advantageous than any of the following discounts:
(1) two successive discounts
(2) three successive discounts
(3) a discount followed by a discount
What is the smallest possible positive integer value of ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
C
Key insight
Discounts one after another multiply what is left of the price. The three deals take off 27.75%, 27.1% and 28.75%, so n must be more than 28.75.
Solution
Use a price of , so every percent is just a number of dollars.
- Two discounts. off leaves . Another off takes off , leaving . Total discount: , or .
- Three discounts. . Total discount: .
- then . , then of is , leaving . Total discount: .
- The single discount of must be more advantageous than every one of these, so it must take off more than the biggest of them: .
- The smallest whole number bigger than is .
The answer is .
Why this works
The second discount is taken from a price that is already lower, so two discounts take off less than . To compare deals, track how much of the price is left after each one; multiplying the "left over" parts (, and so on) does this quickly. Also read the inequality carefully: "more advantageous than" is strict, so has to beat , not tie it.
The trap
Adding discounts (15 + 15 = 30%) instead of applying the second to the already lower price, or choosing 28 when n must beat 28.75.
Concise solution
Compute the fraction of the price that remains after each scheme.
(1) , an effective discount of .
(2) , an effective discount of .
(3) , an effective discount of .
The single discount must be strictly better than all three, so . The smallest integer is .
The answer is .
Review in the AoPS books
- Introduction to Algebra, Chapter 6: Ratios and Percents
- Introduction to Algebra, Chapter 7: Proportion (§7.1, §7.2, §7.3)
- Prealgebra, Chapter 13: Data and Statistics (§13.1)
Techniques
Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed