Real numbers , , and are chosen independently and at random from the interval for some positive integer . The probability that no two of , , and are within 1 unit of each other is greater than . What is the smallest possible value of ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
D
Key insight
Sort so x < y < z, then slide y down 1 and z down 2. The gaps disappear, and the probability is ((n - 2)/n)^3.
Solution
Setting up. Think of as a random point in a cube with side . The probability is the volume of the "good" part divided by the whole volume .
1. Sort first. The six orders ( smallest, smallest, and so on) are equally likely and give the same shape of good region. So look only at the order . That piece of the cube has volume .
2. The condition, once sorted. With , "no two within " means is at least more than , and is at least more than . Then is automatically at least more than .
3. Remove the gaps. Try a concrete case with : the good triple , , . Slide down by and down by to get . These are still in order, and all lie between and .
In general, set , , . The conditions and become just . And since , we get . So the good sorted triples match up exactly with sorted triples in .
4. Volume. Sliding does not change volume. Sorted triples in fill of volume. So
5. Find the smallest . The fraction grows as grows, so test the choices from the smallest:
- : , and is less than half of . Too small.
- : , which is more than .
The answer is .
Why this works
"No two within " is the smooth version of choosing numbers with gaps. Sort them, slide each one back by the gaps in front of it, and the condition disappears. Sorting costs a factor of on both top and bottom, which cancels, and sliding does not change volume. The same trick works for any number of values and any gap size.
Alternative approach
Check the method with two numbers, where you can draw the picture. For in , the sliding trick predicts . In the by square, the bad points form a strip along the diagonal where and are less than apart. The good points form two right triangles with legs , with total area . So the probability really is , as the trick predicts.
The trap
Treating the three conditions as independent and multiplying their chances, or guessing from the two-number answer and using n - 1 instead of n - 2.
Concise solution
The point is uniform in a cube of side , so the probability is the volume of the good region divided by .
By symmetry the six orderings of are equally likely, so restrict to . This slice has volume , and within it the condition is just and (the pair is then automatically at least apart).
Remove the mandatory gaps: set , , . The conditions become
which is the ordered slice of a cube of side . Shifting does not change volume, so the good ordered volume is , and
We need . Since increases with , test the choices upward: gives , and gives .
The answer is .
Review in the AoPS books
- Introduction to Counting & Probability, Chapter 10: Geometric Probability
- Introduction to Geometry, Chapter 14: Three-Dimensional Geometry
- Intermediate Algebra, Chapter 20: Some Advanced Strategies (§20.2)
- Introduction to Algebra, Chapter 22: Special Manipulations (§22.3)
Techniques
Bound the quantity above/below or estimate to pin it down · Substitute to simplify (u = x+1/x, shifting, scaling) · Exploit symmetry to reduce work or pair up objects