A lattice point in an -coordinate system is any point where both and are integers. The graph of passes through no lattice point with for all such that . What is the maximum possible value of ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
B
Key insight
A lattice hit at integer x means m = k/x; so a is the smallest fraction above 1/2 with denominator at most 100, which is 50/99.
Solution
At an integer , the point is a lattice point exactly when is an integer, i.e. when for some integer . So the line avoids lattice points for precisely when is not a fraction with denominator (before or after reduction) at most .
Therefore the interval is safe as long as it contains no fraction with , and the largest possible is the smallest such fraction exceeding .
For we need , so
To make this gap as small as possible we want (so must be odd) and as large as possible: , . The candidate is , with gap .
Could an even denominator do better? With the best is , giving and gap , which is larger. Cross-check: , so indeed .
Hence every in is safe, while itself hits the lattice point . The maximum is .
The answer is .
Why this works
The lattice-point condition is really a statement about rational slopes with bounded denominators, so the geometry converts into "find the fraction closest to from above with denominator at most ." The gap formula shows that the winning fraction has numerator-over-denominator difference and the largest odd denominator available.
Alternative approach
Check the choices directly. and have denominator , so they are never hit and cannot be the boundary; but they are also smaller or larger than the true boundary, so test them: ? , yes, so choosing is safe but not maximal. Among the rest, is the smallest fraction that is actually hit, so it is the answer.
The trap
Picking 51/100 because 100 is the largest allowed denominator, without checking that the odd denominator 99 gives the closer fraction 50/99.
Common mistakes
- Picking because is the largest allowed denominator, without checking that the odd denominator gives the closer fraction .
- Choosing , which is safe but smaller than , so it is not the maximum .
- Forgetting that the intercept is an integer, so the condition is simply " is an integer"; an irrational or large-denominator intercept would change the problem entirely.
Techniques
Bound the quantity above/below or estimate to pin it down · Consider the largest/smallest element or boundary case