In 1991 the population of a town was a perfect square. Ten years later, after an increase of 150 people, the population was 9 more than a perfect square. Now, in 2011, with an increase of another 150 people, the population is once again a perfect square. Which of the following is closest to the percent growth of the town's population during this twenty-year period?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
E
Key insight
The 2001 condition gives b^2 - a^2 = 141 = 1*141 = 3*47, so a is 70 or 22; only a = 22 makes a^2 + 300 a perfect square.
Solution
Let the 1991 population be . In 2001 it was , so
The factor pairs are and :
- , gives , ;
- , gives , .
In 2011 the population is , which must be a perfect square. For : , not a square (, ). For : . So .
The population grew from to , an increase of :
The answer is .
Why this works
"Two squares differ by a known constant" is the signal for difference of squares: must be a factor pair of the constant, and the constant has only two such pairs. Each pair gives a candidate, and the remaining condition selects the right one. Percent growth is always change over the starting value.
Alternative approach
Skip the algebra and use the 2011 condition alone: with and of the same parity, so both even: , giving . Then test : only gives a square (). Same answer.
The trap
Stopping at the first factorization (a = 70) without checking the 2011 condition, or misreading '9 more than a square' as 'a square plus 9 people later'.
Common mistakes
- Stopping at the first factorization (a = 70) without checking the 2011 condition, or misreading '9 more than a square' as 'a square plus 9 people later'.
- Computing growth as (dividing by the final population) instead of .
Techniques
Apply an identity: SFFT, sum of squares, difference of cubes, Vieta · Test small/specific values or special cases to find or verify the answer