Lucky Larry's teacher asked him to substitute numbers for , , , , and in the expression and evaluate the result. Larry ignored the parentheses but added and subtracted correctly and obtained the correct result by coincidence. The numbers Larry substituted for , , , and were , , , and , respectively. What number did Larry substitute for ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
D
Key insight
Simplifying gives a-b+c-d-e, while Larry computed a-b-c-d+e; the two agree exactly when e = c.
Solution
Remove the parentheses from the inside out, flipping signs each time a minus sign is distributed:
Larry, ignoring parentheses, computed .
The two results are equal when
Since , Larry used . (Check: the correct value is , and Larry's is .)
The answer is .
Why this works
Comparing two expressions symbolically, before substituting numbers, reveals that most terms are identical and only and change sign. Simplifying first turns a five-variable problem into the one-line equation .
Alternative approach
Substitute the known values immediately: correct value , Larry's value . Setting gives .
The trap
Losing track of the sign flips when removing nested parentheses, especially the double negative that makes +c.
Common mistakes
- Losing track of the sign flips when removing nested parentheses, especially the double negative that makes +c.
- Reading Larry's version as (with subtracted), which forces and matches no choice.
Techniques
Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed