Tom's age is years, which is also the sum of the ages of his three children. His age years ago was twice the sum of their ages then. What is ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
D
Key insight
Going back N years, Tom loses N years but his three children together lose 3N. Writing 'Tom then = twice the children then' gives T = 5N.
Solution
Try a small case first to see what happens. Say Tom is and his children are , and (sum ). One year ago Tom was , but the children's ages added to . The children's total dropped by , one for each child.
1. Now: Tom is and the children's ages add to .
2. years ago: Tom was . Each of the three children was years younger, so their total was .
3. Back then Tom's age was twice the children's total:
4. Move the 's to one side and the 's to the other: , so .
5. Therefore
The answer is .
Why this works
Everyone gets older at the same speed, so age problems turn into simple equations. The one thing to watch is a total of several people's ages: going back years, a total of ages drops by , not by .
Alternative approach
Plug in a number. Take . Then , so and . That gives . (A real family fitting these numbers would need larger, for example and , but the ratio is the same.)
The trap
Taking only N off the children's total, forgetting that each of the three children was N years younger.
Concise solution
Right now Tom is and the children's ages add to .
Go back years. Tom was . Each of the three children was years younger, so their total was . The condition "Tom's age was twice their sum" reads
Rearranging, , so
The answer is .
Review in the AoPS books
- Introduction to Algebra, Chapter 3: One-Variable Linear Equations (§3.3, §3.4)
- Introduction to Algebra, Chapter 7: Proportion (§7.4)
Techniques
Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed