Suppose that and are positive integers such that . What is the minimum possible value of ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
D
Key insight
75 is 3 times 5 times 5. To make a perfect cube, m must add two more 3s and one more 5, so m = 45 and n = 15.
Solution
A perfect cube, like or , has each prime factor appearing a multiple of times. So look at the prime factors of .
1. Factor. . There is one and two s.
2. What is missing? To reach three of each, we need two more s and one more . So the smallest is
3. Check. . So .
4. Sum. .
5. Could a bigger give a smaller sum? No. Any that works must be a multiple of (it needs a and a ). If , then , which is much bigger. Making bigger makes grow very fast, so the smallest choice wins.
The answer is .
Why this works
"Make this a perfect cube" is really about counting prime factors: each prime must show up a multiple of times. The smallest just fills in what is missing. Because grows like a cube as grows, the smallest also gives the smallest sum.
The trap
Answering just n = 15 or just m = 45 instead of their sum, or thinking a bigger n might give a smaller total.
Concise solution
Factor: . For to be a perfect cube, every prime in its factorization must appear to a power divisible by . The prime currently has exponent , so must contribute at least ; the prime has exponent , so must contribute at least .
The smallest choice is , which gives , so and .
Could a larger give a smaller sum? Any valid must be divisible by and , so , and then . The sum increases with , so is optimal.
The answer is .
Review in the AoPS books
- Introduction to Number Theory, Chapter 1: Integers: The Basics
- Introduction to Number Theory, Chapter 2: Primes and Composites
- Introduction to Algebra, Chapter 20: Special Functions (§20.3)
- Introduction to Number Theory, Chapter 4: Prime Factorization (§4.2, §4.4)
Techniques
Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed · Consider the largest/smallest element or boundary case