Mr. Jones has eight children of different ages. On a family trip his oldest child, who is 9, spots a license plate with a 4-digit number in which each of two digits appears two times. "Look, daddy!" she exclaims. "That number is evenly divisible by the age of each of us kids!" "That's right," replies Mr. Jones, "and the last two digits just happen to be my age." Which of the following is not the age of one of Mr. Jones's children?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
B
Key insight
If 5 were an age the even number would end in 0, forcing the form d0d0 with d = 9, but 9090 is divisible by neither 4 nor 8.
Solution
The eight distinct ages are at most and include , so they are with exactly one number removed. Call the plate number .
Suppose is not the removed age. Only one of can be missing, so is even; being also a multiple of , it ends in . Its two digits are therefore and some , each used twice. The last two digits form Mr. Jones's age, so they are not ; the number is not either (it must end in ), leaving .
Divisibility by (the oldest child's age) forces to be a multiple of , so and . But is not a multiple of , so ; then is the missing age, so must be present, yet either. Contradiction.
Hence is the missing age. (A consistent plate exists: the ages have lcm , and has two digits each twice and ends in .)
The answer is .
Why this works
Divisibility by combined with evenness pins the last digit to , and the repeated-digit structure then leaves almost no freedom, so the assumption "5 is present" collapses after checking one candidate number. In "which one is impossible" problems, attack the choice with the most restrictive divisibility rule first.
Alternative approach
Constructive: the digit sum must be a multiple of , so . Among multiples of with four digits, is the only one with the two-digits-twice pattern, and it is not divisible by . Checking lcms that omit , , or instead (each still needs , hence a digit) yields no valid plate.
The trap
Testing digit-sum conditions only and never using that the number is even, or forgetting that exactly one age from 1 to 9 is absent.
Common mistakes
- Testing digit-sum conditions only and never using that the number is even, or forgetting that exactly one age from 1 to 9 is absent.
- Concluding is missing because fails divisibility by , without noticing that then would have to divide the number.
Techniques
Use the answer choices (mod checks, size, form) to eliminate or select · Organized listing / direct enumeration