Patty has coins consisting of nickels and dimes. If her nickels were dimes and her dimes were nickels, she would have cents more. How much are her coins worth?
- A)
$1.15
- B)
$1.20
- C)
$1.25
- D)
$1.30
- E)
$1.35
Answer
A
Key insight
Swapping adds 5 cents per nickel and removes 5 per dime, so 5(n - d) = 70; with n + d = 20 that is 17 nickels and 3 dimes.
Solution
Let be the number of nickels and the number of dimes, so .
Consider what the swap does coin by coin: each nickel becoming a dime adds cents, and each dime becoming a nickel removes cents. The net change is cents, and we are told it equals :
Adding this to gives , so and .
Her coins are worth cents.
The answer is .
Why this works
Instead of computing both totals in full, track the change caused by the swap; it depends only on . Together with the count , a sum and a difference pin down both unknowns instantly. "Would have cents more" is a statement about a difference, so model the difference directly.
Alternative approach
Let be the current value and the swapped value, in cents. Every coin is worth in one configuration and in the other, so . With , we get and , without ever finding and .
The trap
Setting up the swap with the sign reversed (dimes outnumbering nickels), which gives 3 nickels and 17 dimes worth $1.85, not among the choices.
Common mistakes
- Setting up the swap with the sign reversed (dimes outnumbering nickels), which gives 3 nickels and 17 dimes worth 18570$ into the equation.
Techniques
Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed