Cindy was asked by her teacher to subtract 3 from a certain number and then divide the result by 9. Instead, she subtracted 9 and then divided the result by 3, giving an answer of 43. What would her answer have been had she worked the problem correctly?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
A
Key insight
Undo Cindy's steps in reverse (multiply 43 by 3, add 9) to recover the original number 138, then apply the correct steps.
Solution
Let the starting number be . Cindy's wrong procedure gives
Reverse her steps: multiply by to get , then add to get .
Now do what the teacher asked: subtract and divide by :
The answer is .
Why this works
A sequence of operations applied to an unknown can be peeled off in reverse order using inverse operations; this recovers the input without any guessing. Once the original number is known, the "correct" computation is a single line. Read carefully which pair of steps is wrong and which is right; the numbers and are deliberately swapped to cause confusion.
The trap
Stopping at 138 (the original number, choice E) or at 43 without redoing the problem correctly.
Common mistakes
- Stopping at 138 (the original number, choice E) or at 43 without redoing the problem correctly.
- Applying the inverse operations in the wrong order (adding before multiplying by ), which gives and a non-integer result.
Techniques
Start from the end state / desired conclusion and reverse