In the year , the United States will host the International Mathematical Olympiad. Let and be distinct positive integers such that the product . What is the largest possible value of the sum ?
- A)
- B)
- C)
- D)
- E)
Answer
E
Key insight
Factor 2001 = 3 * 23 * 29; with the product fixed, the sum is largest when two factors are as small as possible, namely 1 and 3.
Solution
The digit sum of is , so divides it: .
We want three distinct positive integers whose product is and whose sum is as large as possible. For a fixed product, a sum grows as the factors become more lopsided, so we want one giant factor and two tiny ones. The two smallest distinct factors we can use are and , which leaves for the third:
For comparison, the other ways to split into three distinct factors give , , and , all smaller.
The answer is .
Why this works
When a product is fixed, spreading the factors apart increases their sum (compare with ). The problem's only real content is the factorization of and remembering that counts as a positive integer factor; "distinct" merely rules out .
Alternative approach
The choices are ordered, and is visibly the sum of three factors of once you check . Since it is the largest option offered and it is attainable, it must be the answer.
The trap
Using the three prime factors 3, 23, 29 (sum 55) without noticing that 1 is an allowed factor.
Common mistakes
- Using the three prime factors 3, 23, 29 (sum 55) without noticing that 1 is an allowed factor.
- Failing to test for divisibility by and treating it as prime, which leads nowhere because is not distinct.
Techniques
Set up the equation/formula and compute; no special trick needed · Consider the largest/smallest element or boundary case